Joint vision 2020.pdf

(1895 KB) Pobierz
2020
America’s Military—
Preparing for
Tomorrow
Summer 2000 /
JFQ
57
documentation
Joint Vision
s
JOINT
VISION
2020
CJCS Vision . . .
Dedicated individuals and innovative organizations
transforming the joint force for the 21
st
century
to achieve full spectrum dominance:
Persuasive in peace
Decisive in war
Preeminent in any form of conflict
T
he U.S. military today is a force of su-
perbly trained men and women who
are ready to deliver victory for our Na-
tion. In support of the objectives of
our national security strategy, it is routinely em-
ployed to shape the international security envi-
ronment and stands ready to respond across the
full range of potential military operations. But
the focus of this document is the third element of
our strategic approach—the need to prepare now
for an uncertain future.
Joint Vision 2020
builds upon and extends the
conceptual template established by
Joint Vision
2010
to guide the continuing transformation of
the Armed Forces. The primary purpose of those
forces has been and will be to fight and win the
Nation’s wars. The overall goal of the transforma-
tion described in this document is the creation of
a force that is dominant across the full spectrum
of military operations—persuasive in peace, deci-
sive in war, preeminent in any form of conflict.
In 2020, the Nation will face a wide range of
interests, opportunities, and challenges and will
require a military that can both win wars and
contribute to peace. The global interests and re-
sponsibilities of the United States will endure,
and there is no indication that threats to those
interests and responsibilities, or to our allies, will
disappear. The strategic concepts of decisive force,
power projection, overseas presence, and strategic
agility will continue to govern our efforts to fulfill
those responsibilities and meet the challenges of
the future. This document describes the opera-
tional concepts necessary to do so.
If the Armed Forces are to be faster, more
lethal, and more precise in 2020 than they are
today, we must continue
to invest in and develop
new military capabilities.
This vision describes the
ongoing transformation
to those new capabilities.
As first explained in
Joint
Vision 2010,
and depend-
ent upon realizing the po-
tential of the information
revolution, today’s capa-
bilities for maneuver,
strike, logistics, and pro-
tection will become domi-
nant maneuver, precision
engagement, focused lo-
gistics, and full dimen-
sional protection.
The joint force, be-
cause of its flexibility and
responsiveness, will re-
main the key to operational success in the future.
The integration of core competencies provided by
the individual services is essential to the joint
team, and the employment of the capabilities of
the total force (active, Reserve, National Guard,
and civilian members) increases the options for
the commander and complicates the choices of
our opponents. To build the most effective force
for 2020, we must be fully joint: intellectually,
operationally, organizationally, doctrinally, and
technically.
This vision is centered on the joint force in
2020. The date defines a general analytical focus
rather than serving as a definitive estimate or
deadline. The document does not describe coun-
ters to specific threats, nor does it enumerate
weapon, communication, or other systems we
will develop or purchase. Rather, its purpose is to
describe in broad terms the human talent—the
professional, well-trained, and ready force—and
operational capabilities that will be required for
the joint force to succeed across the full range of
military operations and accomplish its mission in
2020 and beyond. In describing those capabili-
ties, the vision provides a vector for the wide-
ranging program of exercises and experimenta-
tion being conducted by the services and
combatant commands and the continuing evolu-
tion of the joint force. Based on the joint vision
implementation program, many capabilities will
documentation
58
JFQ
/ Summer 2000
JOINT
VISION
2020
s
U.S. Air Force (Val Gempis)
The evolution of these elements over the
next two decades will be strongly influenced by
two factors. First, the continued development
and proliferation of information technologies will
substantially change the conduct of military op-
erations. These changes in the information envi-
ronment make information superiority a key en-
abler of the transformation of the operational
capabilities of the joint force and the evolution of
joint command and control. Second, the Armed
Forces will continue to rely on a capacity for in-
tellectual and technical innovation. The pace of
technological change, especially as it fuels
changes in the strategic environment, will place a
premium on our ability to foster innovation in
our people and organizations across the entire
range of joint operations. The overall vision of
the capabilities we will require in 2020, as intro-
duced above, rests on our assessment of the
strategic context in which our forces will operate.
STRATEGIC CONTEXT
Three aspects of the world of 2020 have sig-
nificant implications for the Armed Forces. First,
the United States will continue to have global in-
terests and be engaged with a variety of regional
actors. Transportation, communications, and in-
formation technology will continue to evolve and
foster expanded economic ties and awareness of
international events. Our security and economic
interests, as well as our political values, will pro-
vide the impetus for engagement with interna-
tional partners. The joint force of 2020 must be
prepared to win across the full range of military
operations in any part of the world, to operate
with multinational forces, and to coordinate mili-
tary operations, as necessary, with government
agencies and international organizations.
be operational well before 2020, while others will
continue to be explored and developed through
exercises and experimentation.
The overarching focus of this vision is full
spectrum dominance—achieved through the in-
terdependent application of dominant maneuver,
precision engagement, focused logistics, and full
dimensional protection. Attaining that goal re-
quires the steady infusion of new technology and
modernization and replacement of equipment.
However, material superiority alone is not suffi-
cient. Of greater importance is the development
of doctrine, organizations, training and educa-
tion, leaders, and people that effectively take ad-
vantage of the technology.
Figure 1. Full Spectrum Dominance
Dominant Maneuver
Information
Superiority and
Technological
Innovations
Precision Engagement
Peacetime Engagement
Deterrence and Conflict Prevention
Full-Dimensional Protection
Focused Logistics
Fight and Win
Summer 2000 /
JFQ
59
documentation
s
JOINT
VISION
2020
documentation
Second, potential adversaries will have access
to the global commercial industrial base and
much of the same technology as the U.S. military.
We will not necessarily sustain a wide technologi-
cal advantage over our adversaries in all areas. In-
creased availability of commercial satellites, digi-
tal communications, and the public Internet all
give adversaries new capabilities at a relatively
low cost. We should not expect opponents in
2020 to fight with strictly industrial age tools.
Our advantage must therefore come from leaders,
people, doctrine, organizations, and training that
enable us to take advantage of technology to
achieve superior warfighting effectiveness.
Third, we should expect potential adversaries
to adapt as our capabilities evolve. We have supe-
rior conventional warfighting capabilities and ef-
fective nuclear deterrence today, but this favor-
able military balance is not static. In the face of
such strong capabilities, the appeal of asymmetric
approaches and the focus on the development of
niche capabilities will increase. By developing
and using approaches that avoid U.S. strengths
and exploit potential vulnerabilities using signifi-
cantly different methods of operation, adversaries
will attempt to create conditions that effectively
delay, deter, or counter the application of U.S.
military capabilities.
The potential of such asymmetric ap-
proaches is perhaps the most serious danger the
United States faces in the immediate future—
and this danger includes long-range ballistic
missiles and other direct threats to U.S. citizens
and territory. The asymmetric methods and ob-
jectives of an adversary are often far more im-
portant than the relative technological imbal-
ance, and the psychological impact of an attack
might far outweigh the actual physical damage
inflicted. An adversary may pursue an asymmet-
ric advantage on the tactical, operational, or
strategic level by identifying key vulnerabilities
and devising asymmetric concepts and capabili-
ties to strike or exploit them. To complicate mat-
ters, our adversaries may pursue a combination
of asymmetries, or the United States may face a
number of adversaries who, in combination, cre-
ate an asymmetric threat. These asymmetric
threats are dynamic and subject to change, and
the Armed Forces must maintain the capabilities
necessary to deter, defend against, and defeat
any adversary who chooses such an approach.
To meet the challenges of the strategic environ-
ment in 2020, the joint force must be able to
achieve full spectrum dominance.
60
JFQ
/ Summer 2000
982
d
Signal Company (James V. Dowden, Jr.)
JOINT
VISION
2020
s
FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE
The ultimate goal of our military force is to
accomplish the objectives directed by the National
Command Authorities. For the joint force of the
future, this goal will be achieved through full spec-
trum dominance—the ability of U.S. forces, operat-
ing unilaterally or in combination
with multinational and interagency
partners, to defeat any adversary and
Sources of Friction
control any situation across the full
s
effects of danger and
range of military operations.
exertion
The full range of operations in-
cludes maintaining a posture of
s
uncertainty and chance
strategic deterrence. It includes the-
s
unpredictable actions
ater engagement and presence activi-
of other actors
ties. It includes conflict involving
s
frailties of machines and
employment of strategic forces and
information
weapons of mass destruction, major
theater wars, regional conflicts, and
s
human frailties.
smaller-scale contingencies. It also in-
cludes those ambiguous situations re-
siding between peace and war, such
as peacekeeping and peace enforcement opera-
tions, as well as noncombat humanitarian relief
operations and support to domestic authorities.
The label
full spectrum dominance
implies that
U.S. forces are able to conduct prompt, sustained,
and synchronized operations with combinations
of forces tailored to specific situations and with
access to and freedom to operate in all domains—
land, sea, air, space, and information. Addition-
ally, given the global nature of our interests and
obligations, the United States must maintain its
Figure 2. Range of Military Operations
combat
overseas presence forces and the ability to rapidly
project power worldwide in order to achieve full
spectrum dominance.
Achieving full spectrum dominance means
the joint force will fulfill its primary purpose—
victory in war—as well as achieving success across
the full range of operations, but it does not mean
that we will win without cost or difficulty. Con-
flict results in casualties despite our best efforts to
minimize them and will continue to do so when
the force has achieved full spectrum dominance.
Additionally, friction is inherent in military oper-
ations. The joint force of 2020 will seek to create
a “frictional imbalance” in its favor by using the
capabilities envisioned in this document, but the
fundamental sources of friction cannot be elimi-
nated. We will win—but we should not expect
war in the future to be either easy or bloodless.
The requirement for global operations, the
ability to counter adversaries who possess
weapons of mass destruction, and the need to
shape ambiguous situations at the low end of the
range of operations will present special challenges
en route to achieving full spectrum dominance.
Therefore, the process of creating the joint force of
the future must be flexible—to react to changes in
the strategic environment and the adaptations of
potential enemies, to take advantage of new tech-
nologies, and to account for variations in the pace
of change. The source of that flexibility is the syn-
ergy of the core competencies of the individual
services, integrated into the joint team. These
challenges will require a total force composed of
well-educated, motivated, and competent people
who can adapt to the many demands of future
joint missions. The transformation of the joint
force to reach full spectrum dominance
rests upon information superiority as a key
enabler and our capacity for innovation.
Information Superiority
noncombat
Information, information processing,
and communications networks are at the
core of every military activity. Throughout
history, military leaders have regarded in-
formation superiority as a key enabler of
victory. However, the ongoing information
revolution is creating not only a quantita-
tive, but a qualitative change in the infor-
mation environment that by 2020 will re-
sult in profound changes in the conduct of
military operations. In fact, advances in in-
formation capabilities are proceeding so
rapidly that there is a risk of outstripping
our ability to capture ideas, formulate oper-
ational concepts, and develop the capacity
to assess results. While the goal of achiev-
ing information superiority will not
Military
Operation
General
U.S. Goals
War
Military Operations Other Than War
Fight and Win
Deter War
and
Resolve Conflict
Promote Peace
and
Support U.S.
Authorities
Examples
Large Scale Combat
Operations
Attack /Defend /Blockade
Peace Enforcement
Counterterrorism
Show of Force / Raid /Strike
Peacekeeping/NEO
Nuclear Assistance
Counterinsurgency
Freedom of Navigation
Counterdrug
Humanitarian Assistance
Protection of Shipping
U.S. Civil Support
Summer 2000 /
JFQ
61
documentation
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin