Piper_Michael_Collins_-_The_power_behind_Sarah_Palin.pdf

(2103 KB) Pobierz
SPECIAL AMERICAN FREE PRESS REPORT ON THE SARAH PALIN PHENOMENON
THE
POWER
BEHIND
SARAHPALIN
INTRODUCTION
SOME COLD, HARD FACTS THAT NEITHER
SARAH’S FANS NOR HER CRITICS UNDERSTAND
WHO’S REALLY BEHIND THE
SARAH PALIN PHENOMENON?
There’s more to the story than meets the eye!
Although it is undoubtedly true that many self-styled “liberal”
writers and self-perceived “grass-roots” activists of the liberal
stripe have hammered away at Sarah Palin and contributed to a
wide-ranging array of misinformation about her, particularly
during the heat of the 2008 presidential campaign, the fact re-
mains—hard as it may be for both Palin’s liberal critics and her con-
servative defenders to understand—that, at the higher, decision-
making levels of the elite circles who own and control the big print and
broadcast media, the word has obviously been sent down to promote
Palin’s money-making and publicity-seeking ventures. AND THAT’S
PRECISELY WHAT WE NOW SEE HAPPENING!
While Palin has most definitely carved out a niche in the American political
pantheon as a “maverick” with a traditional conservative bent, highly regarded by
many for her devotion to family values (and she has a most attractive family at that),
the point remains that the big money power brokers who control the mass media have
actually lent their support to Palin by giving her an AVALANCHE OF PROMOTION.
What role the big money interests behind the scenes perceive for Palin in the future remains
to be seen, but the evidence assembled here—uncomfortable though it may be for many, both on
the “left” and the “right”—suggests indeed that high-level forces are laying the groundwork for a fu-
ture national political endeavor by Palin. You won’t find this in-depth analysis anywhere else in print today.
Although Mrs. Palin’s new memoir, entitled
Going Rogue,
promulgates the theme that Palin is “free and
independent” in the Alaskan spirit with which she is identified, the truth is that Mrs. Palin is
not “rogue” at all when it comes to the big issues that concern those who are now giving
“Galloping Palinism” free rein in the big money-controlled big media in America.
#
B-2
AMERICAN FREE PRESS
•
DECEMBER 28, 2009 • ISSUE 52
THE POWER BEHIND PALIN: AN AFP SPECIAL REPORT
Yes, ‘Liberal’ Media Promotes Palin—Why?
By Michael Collins Piper
n case you haven’t figured it out for yourself, here is
the cold, hard truth: the tightly-knit clique of fami-
lies and financial interests who control the mass
broadcast and print media in America are providing
a major boost to the political fortunes of former Alaska
Governor Sarah Palin, the failed 2008 Republican vice
presidential candidate.
“Oh no, that’s not true,” cry many naïve conservative
supporters of Palin, who contend that “the liberal media is
biased against Sarah.”
In fact, every time liberal media commentators men-
tion Palin in even a negative way, it’s actually good pub-
licity, underscoring the old catchphrase asserting that “Bad
publicity is better than no publicity at all.”
Not only is the publicity (both good and bad) helping
boost sales of Palin’s new book,
Going Rogue,
which she
is promoting in a cross-country tour, largely visiting
medium-sized cities and areas where the Republican Party
scored best in the last election, but it also helping rally
Palin’s “conservative” base behind her all the more so.
I
And, at the same time, ironically, those naïve grass-
roots “liberals” who don’t like Palin—and who enjoy
seeing her skewered by liberal commentators—don’t un-
derstand the big picture: that is, by giving Palin public-
ity in her national book tour, the big money-controlled
big media is not only helping build up the former Alaska
governor’s bank accounts (both personal and political)
but also keeping the once-obscure figure’s national po-
litical aspirations in the forefront of the public eye.
Don’t forget: two of the most powerful voices in the
American media today—whether you like them or not—
are billionaire Black feminist icon Oprah Winfrey (said to
be the richest single woman in America) and ABC’s ag-
gressive celebrity-interviewing celebrity in her own right,
Barbara Walters. They were among the first of the major
media titans to lend a hand to Palin’s money-making and
publicity-seeking ventures of recent weeks. Winfrey fea-
tured Palin as a guest on her talk program, guaranteeing
a major boost in Palin’s book sales. Then Walters con-
ducted an interview with Palin that was not broadcast
once but, instead, drawn out over several broadcasts, as-
suring an even bigger audience for Sarah’s efforts.
Big Money, Powerful Families Behind Big Push for Palin
By Michael Collins Piper
any conservatives and liberals alike will be
astonished by the fact-filled series of articles
in this special report on Sarah Palin, partic-
ularly the clear demonstration that the “lib-
eral”
Washington Post
and its sister publication,
Newsweek,
have been—for a long time—promoting the
political and personal fortunes of “right wing maverick”
Sarah Palin.
To understand that Palin is not at all “going rogue” as
she would like to suggest (and
Going Rogue
happens to
be the title of Palin’s new much-hyped memoir) it is criti-
cal to understand the nature of the Washington Post Com-
pany and those who control it.
While the
Post
and
Newsweek
invariably convey a cul-
turally liberal, “politically correct” outlook, often aligned
with the Democratic Party—and certainly contrary to what
is perceived to be the world view of Sarah Palin—the bot-
tom line agenda for both publications is the maintenance
of the American political system as it exists today, domi-
nated by a tightly knit clique of families and financial
groups, international in scope, hardly at all concerned with
the needs and concerns of grass-roots Americans.
So, in a sense, neither the
Post
nor
Newsweek
is, in the
bigger picture, really “liberal” at all. Rather, instead, they
are a combined and powerful force for the most secretive
and yet most powerful interests operating on American
soil.
To understand the
Post-Newsweek
connection to the
M
banking elite is to understand why even an ostensible
“rogue” such as Sarah Palin is considered useful to the de-
signs of the global money masters.
In fact, the publishers of the
Post
and
Newsweek
have
been intimately and directly linked, for almost a century, to
the privately-owned Federal Reserve System, the Roth-
schild-dominated international-banker-controlled money
monopoly that controls the American economy, a point
many Americans are just now beginning to realize, thanks
to the efforts of genuine mavericks such as Rep. Ron Paul
(R-Tex.) and former Rep. Jim Traficant (D-Ohio).
You see, the
Post
was purchased at firesale prices, fac-
ing bankruptcy, in 1933 by Wall Street manipulator Eu-
gene Meyer who earlier made a vast fortune as a World
War I-era war profiteer under the administration of
Woodrow Wilson.
But—more significantly—Meyer was named as one of
the earliest chairmen of the board of governors of the Fed-
eral Reserve System and later as head of the World Bank,
along with the Fed one of the primary sources of financial
manipulation (on behalf of big money interests) on the
face of the planet today. In addition, through his family re-
lationship to the grand rabbi of France and to the Levi-
Strauss garment empire (like the Meyer family, one of the
biggest of America’s Jewish fortunes) Meyer was certainly
one of the most powerful figures in America, especially
after he began utilizing the
Washington Post
as a foremost
political force in the nation’s capital.
Meyer’s daughter, Katharine Meyer Graham, later
emerged as a major power broker on her own and, with her
son Donald Graham, became a regular attendee at the in-
ternational Bilderberg meetings. Sponsored jointly by the
billionaire Rockefeller family of America and their senior
partners, the even wealthier Rothschilds of Europe, Bilder-
berg is an annual, heavily-guarded gathering of a select
and secretive group of global financiers, industrialists,
politicians, policy makers and others who—despite their
claims to the contrary—work directly to shape the course
of world affairs through the high-level influence in the na-
tions of the West.
Yet, despite the Meyer-Graham family’s close attention
to promoting the Rothschild-Rockefeller Bilderberg
agenda in the pages of the
Post
and
Newsweek,
reports
about Bilderberg itself never appear in Meyer-Graham pub-
lications or in any of the other major American media
voices controlled by the inter-connected elite of Bilderberg.
And while the
Post-Newsweek
empire is most publicly
identified with the Meyer-Graham heirs, the truth is that
another major figure behind the publishing giant is Ne-
braska-based investor Warren Buffet who—while por-
trayed as a “maverick” himself—has long cultivated close
financial ties to other institutions (with substantial stock
holdings in the
Post-Newsweek
holding company) that are,
like Buffet himself, closely intertwined with the Roth-
schild empire.
The point of all of this is to demonstrate the nature of
the influential corporate interests that are now promoting
Sarah Palin. They hardly constitute the “grass roots”
Americans that many might believe have fueled the inter-
est in Palin’s political future.
#
THE POWER BEHIND PALIN: AN AFP SPECIAL REPORT
AMERICAN FREE PRESS
•
DECEMBER 28, 2009 • ISSUE 52
B-3
Then, of course,
Newsweek
magazine (owned by the
publishers of the powerful
Washington Post,
the daily “lib-
eral” newspaper in the nation’s capital) featured Palin in a
cover story including a glamorous “sex appeal” image of
Mrs. Palin in running shorts, her notably attractive legs
bared to the world, posed next to an American flag.
In fact, the picture itself was not even a
Post
exclusive.
Rather, the
Post
dragged out a six-month-old photograph
of Mrs. Palin that had originally been taken for
Runner’s
World
magazine.
So although Palin loudly announced her grief that
Newsweek
had acted in a “sexist” fashion by publishing
that cover illustration,
Palin was crying all the way to the
bank, knowing full well that she had eagerly posed for the
original photograph in the first place.
As if to drive home the idea of the former Alaska gov-
ernor’s apparent sex appeal,
Newsweek
included inside the
magazine several other images of the same sort, including
a rear view of Palin’s legs, from the knees down, with sev-
eral young men in an audience in front of her looking up
at her with expressions of favor. (This picture, too, was
nothing new. It was last widely featured when she resigned
from the Alaska governorship in July.)
Another image featured a Sarah Palin doll, wearing a
high-cut skirt and a low-cut blouse. And yet another
Newsweek
image of Palin—harkening back to the lyrics
of a sexually suggestive 1931 jazz song popularized by the
late blues singer Bessie Smith, cannot even be described
in a family newspaper.
Kathleen Parker, one of the token in-house“conserva-
tives” at
The Washington Post,
admitted that
Newsweek’s
coverage made Palin “the luckiest woman on the planet.”
Parker, who has been one of Palin’s few conservative crit-
ics, summarized it all quite well:
Hats off to the girl from Wasilla who, slightly
more than a year ago, was virtually unknown and
is now on the cover of
Newsweek,
hawking a book
for which she was paid a few million dollars,
drawing huge crowds and getting the kind of free
publicity most celebrities have to jump on Oprah’s
couch to get. Oh, and yes, she got to sit on
Ophrah’s set as well.
And we’re supposed to defend/feel sorry
for/protect Sarah from . . . what? Wild success,
popularity and riches? You must be joking.
Be afraid …
Be VERY
afraid …
As long ago as the early days following Palin’s surprise
selection as John McCain’s 2008 GOP vice presidential
running mate,
American Free Press
(AFP) told its readers
that Palin was, in fact, getting unusually favorable support
from the mass media. As AFP then warned the voters:
“Don’t let the rhetoric from the Republican camp fool you.
The fact is that powerful forces in the American mass
media—led by the ostensibly ‘liberal’
Washington Post
—
are acting as not-so-subtle cheerleaders for the McCain-
Palin campaign.”
In truth, in recent weeks, in the wake of Palin’s book
tour, the
Post
has once again emerged as a cheerleader for
Palin. One of its key political correspondents, Chris Cil-
lizza, opined on November 20, 2008 that “After last week,
it’s impossible to argue about Palin’s influence in the [Re-
publican Party]. She can draw big crowds, sell books and
command the biggest media stages—it doesn’t get much
bigger than Oprah and Barbara Walters. . . . We dubbed
Palin the “prime mover” in Republican politics moons
ago—she acts, others react—and we are sticking by it.”
Cillizza ranks Palin as the number one contender for the
2012 GOP presidential nomination and that’s saying a lot.
To assure its readers that Palin is a very serious con-
tender, the
Post
followed up just four days later on No-
vember 24 with a prominently-placed opinion page
commentary by Matthew Dowd, now a political analyst
for ABC but who in 2004 was chief strategist for George
W. Bush’s reelection campaign. Directly titled: “Yes, she
can: Palin has a shot at the presidency,” Dowd’s commen-
tary concluded: “Like it or not, if Sarah Palin decides to
seek our nation’s highest office, she has a shot.”
What makes Dowd’s opinion so interesting is the fact
that in 2008 Dowd was a Palin critic and today still has
questions about her qualifications. However, he nonethe-
less says she has “a shot” at winning in 2012.
And on November 29, as if to put Palin’s liberal “fem-
inist” critics in their place, the
Post
trumpeted a review of
a new book about Palin’s role in “the shaping of the new
American woman” alongside two other influential women
of the day, liberal icons Hillary Clinton and new first lady
Michelle Obama—a slap by the
Post
at traditional femi-
nists.
The
Post’s
headline over the book review was starkly
direct: “From Gloria Steinem to Sarah Palin.”
Steinem—for those who have forgotten—was a major
star of the “feminist” movement and remains one of its
grande dames
today. But the
Post
was clearly suggesting
that Palin is now the new leader of America’s feminists.
The aforementioned book touting Palin is entitled
You’ve Come a Long Way, Maybe: Sarah, Michelle,
Hillary, and the Shaping of the New American Woman,
no-
tably mentioning Palin in its title even before the other two
big-name female political figures.
The author of the Palin-touting book is a major media
figure herself, Leslie Sanchez, whose political commen-
tary has appeared in
The Wall Street Journal, The NewYork
Times, The Washington Post, U.S. News & World Report,
as
well as NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News Channel,
MSNBC, Univision, Telemundo and other major outlets.
Another point should not go unmentioned: Palin’s
memoir is published by HarperCollins, owned by billion-
aire Rupert Murdoch, a “front man” for the even more
wealthy international Rothschild family banking dynasty.
A hard-line supporter of Israel, Murdoch and his neo-con-
servative magazine,
The Weekly Standard,
played a major
part in pushing for the war against Iraq (and continue to
campaign for war against Iran). And as the accompanying
stories note, Murdoch’s associate, William Kristol, is the
behind-the-scenes intriguer who essentially “invented”
Palin as the 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee.
In addition, another Murdoch-Kristol henchman at
The
Weekly Standard,
Matthew Continetti, is promoting Palin
in a new book entitled
The Persecution of Sarah Palin.
Re-
counting how “liberal” bloggers and others have spun neg-
ative stories about Palin, the book essentially misdirects
grassroots voters—and Palin’s more unsuspecting sup-
porters—from the fact that,
in the bigger picture,
Palin has
actually received much support from powerful media out-
lets from the beginning of her national debut.
As the other stories in this special report demonstrate,
all of this media-generated support for Palin is really no
surprise, since—prior to being anointed as the GOP vice
presidential candidate—Palin already had the backing of
powerful figures little known to the grassroots Americans
who mistakenly thought Palin was “just like them.”
#
A journalist specializing in media critique,
Michael Collins Piper
is the author of
Final Judg-
ment,
the controversial “underground bestseller”
documenting the collaboration of Israeli intelligence
in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He is also
the author of
The High Priests of War, The New
Jerusalem, Dirty Secrets, The Judas Goats, The Golem: Israel’s Nuclear
Hell Bomb, My First Days in the White House
and
The New Babylon.
All are available from AFP. He has lectured in places as diverse as
Malaysia, Japan, Canada, Iran, Russia and the United Arab Emi-
rates. See his website at michaelcollinspiper.com. Piper broadcasts
nightly at 8 pm CST on the Internet at republicbroadcasting.org.
B-4
AMERICAN FREE PRESS
•
DECEMBER 28, 2009 • ISSUE 52
THE POWER BEHIND PALIN: AN AFP SPECIAL REPORT
Palin Praised Big-Time Gangster;
People Ask: ‘Why Did She Do It?’
By Michael Collins Piper
n her new memoir,
Going Rogue,
Sarah Palin goes
out of her way to help perpetuate the mass media’s
long-standing and determined effort to sweep under
the rug the very clear—and very ugly—high-level
organized crime history of the Arizona mob fortune that
paved the way for John McCain’s political career and
thus laid the path for Palin’s own rise to fame in 2008.
In question are Palin’s gratuitous (and actually un-
necessary) words of praise for the late father of Mc-
Cain’s wife Cindy, one Jim Hensley, who was a major
figure in the organized crime syndicate and whose beer
and liquor fortune—said to be worth $100 million—
bankrolled John McCain’s political career.
In her memoir, Palin wrote—quite falsely—that
Cindy McCain has long been victimized and painted in
an unpleasant manner by the mass media, when ab-
solutely nothing could be further from the truth. Writ-
ing of Mrs. McCain, Palin claimed that:
“In Cindy’s case, the press had been pretty merciless
over the years. Because of her upmarket elegance, she’s
almost been ostracized from working class people, but I
loved her life story, which began with her dad starting
out poor. He’d pulled himself up by his bootstraps, and
made a great life for his family.”
I
As we shall see in a moment, contrary to Palin’s ro-
manticized version of the truth, the public record demon-
strates that Palin’s suggestion that the media has
somehow savaged Cindy McCain is anything but the
truth. Likewise, Palin is parroting media lies—and help-
ing cover up—the McCain family’s mob blood money.
The fact that Palin helps continue a false rendition
of history, rather than simply avoiding the subject alto-
gether (which she could, of course, do) raises the ques-
tion as to why
Palin went out of her way to praise a top
organized crime henchman and whitewash his career
and also raises the concern as to whether anything Palin
says can actually be believed by the voters.
Critics are inclined to suggest that Palin almost cer-
tainly knew the real “story behind the story” of the mob
figure that she praised but—as part of her effort to fur-
ther ingratiate herself with the proverbial “powers that
be,” that the Alaska “maverick” played along with the
official cover story regarding the McCain family link to
the most powerful organized crime syndicate in Ameri-
can history, one with international connections and even
bigger than the so-called “Mafia” that’s been immortal-
ized by Hollywood and the mass media in America.
Perhaps not by surprise, two of the biggest major
media voices which have helped cover up the McCain-
mob connection—The
Washington Post,
the powerful
SARAH PALIN:
Gratuitously praised top mob henchman.
daily in the nation’s capital, and the national magazine,
Newsweek,
owned by the Washington Post Company—
are the crown jewels in the
Post-Newsweek
media empire
which is now playing a central role (alongside other
major media outlets) in promoting Sarah Palin’s book-
selling enterprise and her bid for a front-line presence
in the politics of 2012. (See accompanying stories).
The Washington Post
covered up the McCain-Hens-
ley mob connection in its July 22, 2008 edition when it
provided readers a glowing account of Mrs. McCain’s
family, ignoring the more unpleasant facts regarding the
Hensley family’s source of wealth. The
Post
declared:
Cindy Lou Hensley grew up as an only child,
and a privileged one, on a large ranch in an
upper-class section of Phoenix.
Her dad, Jim Hensley, founded what became
a large Anheuser-Busch distributorship, and her
mom, Marguerite, was a proper belle who em-
phasized impeccable manners.
SHOULDN’T YOU READ A BOOK BEFORE YOU WRITE ONE?
BENNETT/CHATANOOGA-TIMES FREE PRESS
The
Post
added, almost lovingly, that Mrs. McCain
was “the apple of her father’s eye.”
As if to underscore the legend, the
Post-owned
Newsweek
magazine followed up on June 30, 2008 by
echoing the
Post
and suppressing the big “story behind
the story.” Reporting that Mrs. McCain’s family “was
deeply rooted in Arizona,” and that her father “was one
of the most prominent men in the state,” who was “a
World War II bombardier . . . shot down over the Eng-
lish Channel”—in other words, a war hero like McCain,
Newsweek
said Hensley “borrowed $10,000 to start a
liquor business” which became one of the largest An-
heuser-Busch distributorships in the country but did
point out that the vast Hensley influence and fortune
“got [McCain] access to money and connections.”
(This came after McCain dumped his ailing first wife
and married his then-mistress, Cindy Hensley, and set-
THE POWER BEHIND PALIN: AN AFP SPECIAL REPORT
AMERICAN FREE PRESS
•
DECEMBER 28, 2009 • ISSUE 52
B-5
tled in Arizona where he first ran for office in 1982.)
So what is the big untold story covered up by McCain
and Palin’s promoters—and now by Palin herself?
Contrary to the “bootstraps” version of history told
by Sarah Palin and
The Washington Post
and
Newsweek
and other big-time media voices, the truth is that Mrs.
McCain’s father was a highly-placed fixture in the Ari-
zona branch of the national organized crime syndicate:
He was the chief henchman of the late Kemper Marley,
Arizona point man for infamous mob chief Meyer Lan-
sky and his powerful partners-in-crime, the Bronfman
family of Montreal who have “gone legit,” so they say.
In that capacity—for 40 years until his death in
1990—Marley was undisputed political boss of Arizona,
acting as the behind-the-scenes power over both the Re-
publican and Democratic parties. As such, his money
and connections played the primary role in advancing
John McCain’s political career from the start.
Although in 2008 some Democrats muttered that
Mrs. McCain’s fortune could impact on her husband’s
decision-making were he elected president, none dared
publicly refer to the fact this wealth was spawned by
what others have indelicately (although correctly) called
“the Jewish Mafia.”
Virtually alone among the media,
American Free
Press
told and retold the story of the McCain family’s
intimate ties to the Lansky crime syndicate and, in par-
ticular, Lansky’s longtime (and quite pivotal) allies, the
Bronfman family of Canada (who are now important
figures in the World Jewish Congress).
During Prohibition, the Canadian-based Bronfmans
supplied—and thus controlled—the “spigot” of liquor
funneled to Lansky syndicate functionaries in the United
States, including Al Capone in Chicago. After Prohibi-
tion, Lansky-Bronfman associates such as Marley got
control of a substantial portion of liquor (and beer) dis-
tribution across the country. Marley’s longtime public
relations man, Al Lizanitz, revealed it was that the Bronf-
mans who set Marley up in the alcohol business.
Married to the mob.
JOHN McCAIN
CINDY HENSLEY McCAIN
Daughter of mob kingpin.
Mob man bankrolled McCain.
JIM HENSLEY
Hensleyʼs Mob boss.
KEMPER MARLEY
In 1948, 52 of Marley’s employees (including Jim
Hensley, the manager of Marley’s company) were pros-
ecuted for federal liquor violations. Hensley got a six-
month suspended sentence and his brother Eugene went
WILL PALIN RETRACT PRAISE FOR MOBSTER?
Supporters of Sarah Palin should bring the
details about John and Cindy McCain’s ties
to organized crime to Mrs. Palin’s attention
and urge her to retract her praise for top mob
henchman Jim Hensley. This would help
clear up questions about Mrs. Palin herself.
to prison for a year. In 1953 Hensley and (this time) Mar-
ley were prosecuted by federal prosecutors for falsify-
ing liquor records, but young attorney William
Rehnquist acted as their “mouthpiece” (as mob attorneys
are known) and the two got off scot-free. Rehnquist later
THE BOOK THAT HAD McCAIN-PALIN RUNNING SCARED
PERFIDY
McCain
EXPOSED!
• This book will tell you WHO allowed this.
• This book will tell you WHAT they did.
• This book will tell you WHERE they did this.
• This book will tell you WHEN they did this.
• This book will tell you HOW it was done.
• Perhaps you can figure out WHY!
The
Government
Cabal That
Knowingly
Abandoned
Our POWs
& Left Them
to Die
PRICES: $25 for one copy. JUST $19 EA. FOR VETS/ACTIVES.
$48 for two copies ($24 each) • $69 for three copies ($23 each)
$88 for four copies ($22 each) •
$105 for five copies ($21 each)
Six or more copies are just $20 each • Carton price: $660 for 44 books
TO ORDER THIS BOOK CALL
1-888-699-NEWS (6397) toll free and charge your copy(s) to Visa or Master-
Card. Send payment for book(s) to
American Free Press,
645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100, Washington, D.C.
20003 using the handy order form on page 16. See www.americanfreepress.net for more. Carton price: $15 each
for 44 books = $660. No further discounts on carton prices.
became chief justice of the Supreme Court and presided
over the “fix” that made George W. Bush president in a
rightly disputed election.
Arizona insiders say Hensley “took the fall” for Mar-
ley in 1948 and Marley paid back Hensley by setting him
up in his own beer distribution business.
Newsweek
im-
plied Hensley’s company was a “mom and pop” opera-
tion that became a big success, but the real story goes to
the heart of the history of organized crime.
Hensley’s sponsor, Marley, was also a major player in
gambling, a protégé of Lansky associate Gus Greenbaum
who, in 1941, set up a national wire for bookmakers.
After Lansky’s longtime partner “Bugsy” Siegel was
“whacked” for stealing from the Flamingo Casino in Las
Vegas—financed in part by loans from an Arizona bank
chaired by Marley—Greenbaum turned the wire over to
Marley while Greenbaum took Siegel’s place tending to
the interests of “the Jewish Mafia” in Las Vegas.
In 1948 Greenbaum was himself murdered in a mob
“hit” that set off a series of gang wars in Phoenix, but
Marley survived and prospered as did Jim Hensley.
McCain’s father-in-law also dabbled in dog racing
and expanded his fortune by selling his track to an indi-
vidual connected to the Buffalo-based Jacobs family, key
Prohibition-era Lansky network distributors of Bronf-
man liquor from across the border in Canada.
Expanding over the years, buying up race tracks and
developing food and drink concessions at sports stadi-
ums, Jacobs enterprises were described as being “prob-
ably the biggest quasi-legitimate cover for organized
crime’s money-laundering in the United States.”
In 1976, Hensley’s mentor—Marley (at the height of
his power)—was the key suspect behind the contract
murder of journalist Don Bolles who was investigating
the mob in Arizona. But Marley was never prosecuted.
Since McCain’s career was sponsored by the Lansky-
Bronfman syndicate, it was no coincidence that, during the
2008 campaign, McCain traveled to London where Lord
Jacob Rothschild of the international banking empire
raised money for McCain among American expatriates.
Like the Bronfmans, Rothschild has long been a major
force on behalf of Israel among the global elite.
In light of her own devotion to Israel, this may be why
Sarah Palin is so enamored of the Jewish mob-connected
family that advanced her own patron—John McCain—
in the seamy politics of mob-dominated Arizona.
#

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika:

Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin